<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AntiCrack For iPhone Makes Promises It Can&#8217;t Keep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101</link>
	<description>A directory of Shareable Links</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul T...</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul T...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Never will you say never!!  It is impossible to stop the crackers..  Software is highly manipulative you know...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never will you say never!!  It is impossible to stop the crackers..  Software is highly manipulative you know&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chupa</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>chupa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>@Drobnik 

I&#039;m not trying to start an internet holy war, but for every copy protection scheme released, three work-arounds are developed shortly thereafter. The best you can really do at that point is try and keep up. Best of luck to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Drobnik </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to start an internet holy war, but for every copy protection scheme released, three work-arounds are developed shortly thereafter. The best you can really do at that point is try and keep up. Best of luck to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Drobnik</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Drobnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Here is my appropriate side of the story, as promised: 

http://www.drobnik.com/touch/2009/11/state-of-the-art-in-cracking-apps/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my appropriate side of the story, as promised: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.drobnik.com/touch/2009/11/state-of-the-art-in-cracking-apps/" rel="nofollow">http://www.drobnik.com/touch/2009/11/state-of-the-art-in-cracking-apps/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3173wizard</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1523</link>
		<dc:creator>3173wizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1523</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe his intentions were to deceive anyone. Having used anticrack on my suite of apps and then gone back and tried to reverse engineer them, I can tell you that the protection works. Lol, I seriously doubt anyone will be able to remove all of the methods contained within it. 

I agree completely that it will not stop someone who is driven and motivated, but it will stop the scumbag script kiddie who doesn&#039;t know tcsh from bash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe his intentions were to deceive anyone. Having used anticrack on my suite of apps and then gone back and tried to reverse engineer them, I can tell you that the protection works. Lol, I seriously doubt anyone will be able to remove all of the methods contained within it. </p>
<p>I agree completely that it will not stop someone who is driven and motivated, but it will stop the scumbag script kiddie who doesn&#8217;t know tcsh from bash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelk42</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelk42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Someone now has a sign on their back reading &quot;H4X ME NAO FOR ENTERTAINMENT.&quot;

Advertising that you&#039;re trying to make apps crack-proof only issues a challenge to the crackers. It&#039;s /sport/ at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone now has a sign on their back reading &#8220;H4X ME NAO FOR ENTERTAINMENT.&#8221;</p>
<p>Advertising that you&#8217;re trying to make apps crack-proof only issues a challenge to the crackers. It&#8217;s /sport/ at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State of the Art in Cracking Apps @ Dr. Touch</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>State of the Art in Cracking Apps @ Dr. Touch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>[...] that AntiCrack 2.0 is able to prevent Crackulous 0.9 from decrypting apps. There was a blog post on freakbits.com flaming me for the original statement. The author of the post enigmax and a couple of other people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that AntiCrack 2.0 is able to prevent Crackulous 0.9 from decrypting apps. There was a blog post on freakbits.com flaming me for the original statement. The author of the post enigmax and a couple of other people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flugalbinder</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Flugalbinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>Lol, the Anticrack guy completely rewrote his advertising now. No more does it completly stop all cracking but just &quot;mitigates&quot; it xD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, the Anticrack guy completely rewrote his advertising now. No more does it completly stop all cracking but just &#8220;mitigates&#8221; it xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Drobnik</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Drobnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>You where right that my advertisement text was not accurate. AntiCrack aims to prevent _automatic_ cracking by means of Crackulous. And as far as I can tell it is successful in doing so. 

I&#039;ll write up my response to this article and will send you the link to cross post it on your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You where right that my advertisement text was not accurate. AntiCrack aims to prevent _automatic_ cracking by means of Crackulous. And as far as I can tell it is successful in doing so. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll write up my response to this article and will send you the link to cross post it on your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBishop</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>So do you actually have evidence of an anti-crack app being cracked or are you just talking trash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do you actually have evidence of an anti-crack app being cracked or are you just talking trash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enigmax</title>
		<link>http://freakbits.com/anticrack-for-iphone-makes-promises-it-cant-keep-1101#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>enigmax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakbits.com/?p=1033#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>Hi Oliver

The only thing I have an issue with is your claim:

&quot;AntiCrack contains proven technology which completely eliminates the risk of your apps getting pirated.”

Like I said, &quot;completely eliminates&quot; is a very bold claim indeed and that&#039;s what caught my eye.

That said, we&#039;re more than happy for you to have your say here, that&#039;s partly what this site is for.

So if you&#039;d like to put together a post and send it to me at enigmax[at]torrentfreak.com we&#039;ll take it from there.

cheers for contributing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Oliver</p>
<p>The only thing I have an issue with is your claim:</p>
<p>&#8220;AntiCrack contains proven technology which completely eliminates the risk of your apps getting pirated.”</p>
<p>Like I said, &#8220;completely eliminates&#8221; is a very bold claim indeed and that&#8217;s what caught my eye.</p>
<p>That said, we&#8217;re more than happy for you to have your say here, that&#8217;s partly what this site is for.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;d like to put together a post and send it to me at enigmax[at]torrentfreak.com we&#8217;ll take it from there.</p>
<p>cheers for contributing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
